Don’t be a crane wife

Posted by on in Blog | 6 comments

Lately I’ve been listening to one of my favorite songs by The Decemberists. It is based on a beautiful and tragic Japanese myth called Tsuru no Ongaeshi or “The Crane Wife.”

After listening to the song a number of times, I realized that the lyrics speak to a common experience for many women:

of being hungrily swallowed up by the needs of loved ones,
of spinning greatness from their own beings on behalf of others,
of giving and giving and giving until they hurt.

Let’s start at the beginning and tell the story of The Crane Wife.

The story

The story, in essence, is this: a man encounters a wounded crane in the woods. He takes it home, nurses it back to health, and releases it to the wild.

Days later, a beautiful woman appears on the man’s doorstep. The man is elated and enamored, and they wed.

After a while, the couple falls on hard times and the wife agrees to bring in good fortune by weaving.

She has only one condition: the husband must not watch her as she works. He agrees, and for many years, she sustains the family and grows its fortune by working late into nights weaving beautiful, gossamer-thin silks.

Eventually, either through curiosity or by accident, the husband stumbles in on his wife working. He discovers that she is an ethereal creature, a crane wife, and that she has pulling out her own feathers to produce these beautiful silks.

She says he has broken their pact and flies away, never to return.

The quiet depletion

The myth varies a bit. In some cases, the husband becomes greedy and forces his wife to work harder and harder. Or, he has a kind heart but is overcome by curiosity and peeks in on her.

I actually prefer the depiction of the gentle husband, because I think it speaks to a quiet depletion that sometimes happens in a loving marriage.

A woman is often taught that she can show love by sacrificing and changing for her partner. I think psychologist and author Helene Brenner said it best in her book I Know I’m in There Somewhere.

“Women yield more of themselves than men do… They see changing themselves for their beloved as a
gift of love… Men change in a relationship, but they don’t offer change as a gift of love. If a man
changes, it must be because he has decided to for himself… Men in love offer affection, gifts, and the
comfort and protection of their presence. But they don’t try to mold themselves for the sake of a
relationship. The very idea sounds ludicrous to a man.”

In the myth, the crane wife changes her shape so that she can become a suitable wife for her husband. She touches down on the earth, breaks contact with her animal self. She loses a bit of her magic, and what magic that remains is harnessed for the good of other people. Her natural shape is distorted.

The deadly loom

How can we translate this dilemma to modern living? This quiet depletion can take many forms:

It happens in the competition we see between mothers about who is making the biggest sacrifices or offering their children the “best” parenting.

Taken to an extreme, it suggests that love=sacrifice and that women who make more sacrifices love their children more.

It emerges in the shaming “selfish” label and other less-than feelings that many women feel when they want to take time for themselves. They feel they are unfairly taking time and resources away from their spouse, children, or work. This dilemma speaks to a larger problem: that they think that their time and resources are owed to others first.

It is hidden in the invisible work that women do every day to run a household. This is more than the simple dilemma about who scrubs the toilets at your house. This is about the weight of unspoken cultural assumptions that women will provide the lion’s share of the childcare, housework, and emotional caregiving in a family. We live in a culture that devalues and hides this work. Because this work is not legitimized, women have no ground to stand on to explain their experiences. After all, how do you explain an invisible burden?

In these ways and many others, women pluck pieces of their selfhood and weave it into the loom. They produce beautiful tapestries—but if you look closely, you can see the blood in the thread.

Toxic giving

In the myth, the crane wife returns in human form to show her gratitude for rescue.  She redeems her debt and shows her gratitude by spinning herself into silk and coin for her family.

This selflessness is not virtuous.

It is actually a form of toxic giving that harms everyone. It sets up unreasonable expectations for men and women.

At its extreme, a woman depletes herself to the point of peril. She then either flees the marriage or exists in a perpetually depleted and exhausted state.

I have worked with more than one woman who has exited a relationship after threading herself through the crane wife’s loom and found that it still was not enough to sustain the relationship.

What makes a crane wife?

There is no harm in doing things for others. The peril comes when you do these things at great cost to yourself, when your own happiness or well-being is sacrificed for someone else’s need.

“If the cost is so high, why would they do this? Why don’t they just stop giving and helping?”

There are all kinds of pressures, large and small, that press women to the loom.

Women are constantly lauded for being selfless, for being generous mothers or partners. They learn that love equals sacrifice, and if they are not vigilant, they begin to barter with bits of themselves to keep others happy.

This is further complicated when a woman has learned early in a high-stakes childhood that her value comes from soothing the hurts and needs of others. It happens when she learns to sacrifice her own selfhood to keep the peace, earn recognition or love, or to remain safe.

Giving, in these circumstances, is not actually giving. You cannot give generously with a gun at your back.

Freeing the crane

The next time someone admiringly calls a woman “selfless,” think of what the word implies. To be selfless is to act without concern for oneself. Is it is a virtue to lose oneself completely in the needs of others?

Is this what you want for yourself, for your daughter or sister or mother?

And should anyone ever try to shame you for being self-possessed or selfish instead of selfless, don’t sit down at the loom. Instead, question why they feel so entitled to a piece of you.

Need help dismantling your loom? Counseling can help with that. Drop me a line or set up an appointment here.

6 Comments

  1. I enjoyed your story of the Crane. My wife is Japanese, do you have the Japanese translation? I would like to add that the husband can be the Crane. In my case I weaved the deadly loom catering to my wife’s expectations, desires, fantasy of provider for years with no emotional, physical support after childbirth. After three years she left with our daughter. I feel used and manipulated as communication was never getting better with us (she refused to participate in non superficial conversations) and she became more and more distant as I attempted to push the relationship into areas of growth. I specifically wanted to help her and I let go of inherited belief systems. Growth in the form of maturing as parents. For example, I would take us to workshops and events where other parents would share their experiences. I would place us in the community around other families so that we all could grow and evolve. My questions is when does not changing, this idea of ” you can’t change people” cross into an attitude of “change is the only constant” and relationship is there for the mirror, for evolving into better people. Seems to be a contradiction here.
    “don’t change me I am lovable as is”, even when it harms the children and partner ?

    or

    “let’s evolve and grow together, holding space when the shadow arrives” Holding space and feeling each others emotions as taught by the likes of Karla McKlaren’s Emotional Awareness series or Terces Engleheart’s Kindred Spirit.
    Thanks, Neil

    • I ask this question too. I’ve changed in my relationship tremendously, change I craved but really didn’t have the motivation in life until I was inspired by wanting to have a happy relationship , which required me to grow in a lot of ways out of many childish habits. I am lovable and have always been lovable but to me ‘lovable doesn’t always equal happy partnership or even working partnership. My love has always loved me this whole time but there were moments when he wasn’t sure if he could be with me because of how emotionally immature I was at the time and kept a lot of toxic friendships and family that would sort of chameleon me into a person I didn’t like to be. I’ve changed a lot of me because I don’t just want to be lovable, I want to be a responsible happy adult woman who can be trusted, relied upon and loved all together. That’s the difference I see

  2. I find this post inspiring and eye opening but also problematic. I certainly do these things to some extent as a woman and I recognize the truth in your wisdom about people expectations of me. But it is my husband that engages in “toxic giving.” I work and he stays home with the children and in some ways it is even harder because of what society deems what a “husband” is or does. As a woman I find more support for my burnout, for example. I would ask that you consider changing the language here to reflect that while society does expect women to give of themselves selflessly, men/fathers may also be toxic givers. I also think of gay parents or single fathers. Understandably the term “Crane Wife” does not lend itself to speaking about men but in this day and age I would like to see more inclusiveness towards men as parents, even if Crane Spouse doesn’t sound as “sexy”.

    • Hi, Katy. I hear you: the dynamic of toxic giving is not limited to women alone. And you’re right that men often face a particular kind of alienation and loneliness in this struggle because they’re running against the grain of social norms if they are taking up what is considered traditionally ‘women’s work.’ It’s also true that these dynamics can express themselves differently in different families, including queer couples and families with single parents, polyamorous triads & quads, etc. This post is centering the experience of straight women in long-term partnerships with men, as that’s a lot of who I help in my own private practice and I wanted to speak to that experience. It’s not meant to suggest that this dynamic of toxic giving is exclusive to straight women in romantic partnership, but rather that it is an extremely common element of those partnerships (and can show up lots of other places, besides). People-pleasing is something that is cultivated at the social/cultural level, but also within families among children due to attachment trauma (which I’ve written about in other posts), and also due to a person’s individual temperament and vulnerability to these intersecting dynamics. It’s a complex picture. Thanks for taking the time to comment and highlight the experiences of others!

  3. This is great! I love the Decemberists and looked up crane wife (because today I saw sandhill cranes in north Platte Nebraska and listened to the echo maker book) and saw this piece. Powerful, insightful and spot on! Love your writing!

  4. I first came across this story from The Decemberists too.

    Recently I heard a recounting of The Fox Wife, a Cree mythological story. Do you find it interesting how similar myths appear in very different parts of the world? Do you find it interesting how stories pervade and persist?

    I’d like to ask you 3 more questions.

    Why did the crane choose to live with the poor man? In some versions, the crane becomes the adopted daughter of a poor elderly couple.

    Why did she make the man promise to not look?

    And why did she have to leave once the door was opened?

Submit a Comment